Comments on: Copyright Controversy: Rebekka vs Only-Dreemin & Rebekka vs Flickr?

By: duncan

duncan — Thu, 17 May 2007 22:40:08 +0000

Holy fashizzle. What a ruckus! That’s quite the epic thing that happened there. It’s interesting.

By: Andrew Ferguson

Andrew Ferguson — Thu, 17 May 2007 20:48:47 +0000

“Also, don’t apologise :)”

I can’t even keep count of how many times a day my girlfriend says that to me.

I’m just way too apologetic.

…I’m sorry. :P

By: Haje

Haje — Thu, 17 May 2007 20:37:36 +0000

Hi man!

Yeah, you’re not wrong, Ed’s a bit of a special one, but then, I’m sure it’ll be fine. I may re-write that write-up to be more on-target, but I think it makes for an even better story, actually: Him claiming that KISS stole the photos from him, and others claiming that he nicked them from other photographers have one thing in common: It’s complicated, and at some point along the way, photos were stolen :) Just goes to show that it can get mighty complicated along the way.

Also, don’t apologise :)

Rock on, bruv!

By: Andrew Ferguson

Andrew Ferguson — Thu, 17 May 2007 19:56:11 +0000

Hey Haje,

Thanks for adding that! I apologize for not including it in the roundup; I felt your post focused a bit more on Ed’s plight with KISS than Rebekka’s situation.

I honestly didn’t want to give Ed’s story any more exposure, if the behaviour he’s been showing to you in email is any indication of how he acts.

I’ll do a quick edit and add you to the blog-o-tron.

By: Photocritic

Photocritic — Thu, 17 May 2007 19:04:48 +0000

Good post! I also wrote about this, in my guide in ‘what the hell should I do, now that someone has nicked my photos’, on