<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preparing for Saskatchewan: My First Attempt at Landscape Photography</title>
	<link>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/</link>
	<description>Photography Tips and Digital Camera News from Andrew Ferguson's Photography Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18502</link>
		<author>Andrew Ferguson</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18502</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Andrea:&lt;/b&gt; That's really cool! I'll have to ask my relatives if there's any canola fields near Swift Current. I'm totally unfamilair with the area, I haven't

&lt;b&gt;@Brian Larter:&lt;/b&gt; The 18-55 is ridiculously soft sometimes, it's like being stuck in Soap-Opera-Vision (tm). It's true that I have the 50mm, I guess it comes down to opening up that extra 7mm with the 10-20 and sacrificing 20mm at the other end, or the other way around.

&lt;b&gt;@Denear:&lt;/b&gt; Man people love that 17-40! Thanks, man. I'll take the two I've got and *maybe* purchase a third while I'm there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Andrea:</b> That&#8217;s really cool! I&#8217;ll have to ask my relatives if there&#8217;s any canola fields near Swift Current. I&#8217;m totally unfamilair with the area, I haven&#8217;t</p>
<p><b>@Brian Larter:</b> The 18-55 is ridiculously soft sometimes, it&#8217;s like being stuck in Soap-Opera-Vision &#8482;. It&#8217;s true that I have the 50mm, I guess it comes down to opening up that extra 7mm with the 10-20 and sacrificing 20mm at the other end, or the other way around.</p>
<p><b>@Denear:</b> Man people love that 17-40! Thanks, man. I&#8217;ll take the two I&#8217;ve got and *maybe* purchase a third while I&#8217;m there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18500</link>
		<author>Andrew Ferguson</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18500</guid>
		<description>Wow! It looks like the Sigma 10-20mm and Canon 17-40mm are by far the most popular lenses. I'm interested in both, but I'm a bit skeptical of the Sigma's limited range. I'm worried that I won't be able to crop out a power cable or something by zooming in.

&lt;b&gt;@Brian Auer:&lt;/b&gt; Wide seems to be the consensus. I don't know if I can handle sticking to as wide as 10-20 all the time, but I'll see. I might rent that lens ahead of time to get a feel for it.

&lt;b&gt;@Erin:&lt;/b&gt; It's in August, I'm afraid, and I've already got my plane ticket. Thanks for the offer, though! :)

&lt;b&gt;@Grums:&lt;/b&gt; Thanks for the review link. Ephoto's not my first choice for lens review, but it's good to get a second opinion. I like the range of the lens but the softness mid-range is a bit of a worry. Like I said to Brian, I might rent it before the trip to get a feel for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! It looks like the Sigma 10-20mm and Canon 17-40mm are by far the most popular lenses. I&#8217;m interested in both, but I&#8217;m a bit skeptical of the Sigma&#8217;s limited range. I&#8217;m worried that I won&#8217;t be able to crop out a power cable or something by zooming in.</p>
<p><b>@Brian Auer:</b> Wide seems to be the consensus. I don&#8217;t know if I can handle sticking to as wide as 10-20 all the time, but I&#8217;ll see. I might rent that lens ahead of time to get a feel for it.</p>
<p><b>@Erin:</b> It&#8217;s in August, I&#8217;m afraid, and I&#8217;ve already got my plane ticket. Thanks for the offer, though! :)</p>
<p><b>@Grums:</b> Thanks for the review link. Ephoto&#8217;s not my first choice for lens review, but it&#8217;s good to get a second opinion. I like the range of the lens but the softness mid-range is a bit of a worry. Like I said to Brian, I might rent it before the trip to get a feel for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denear</title>
		<link>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18086</link>
		<author>Denear</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18086</guid>
		<description>17-40mm f4L would be my first choice.  My second choice would be 24-105mm f4L.
Have a great time, and bring lots of CF cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>17-40mm f4L would be my first choice.  My second choice would be 24-105mm f4L.<br />
Have a great time, and bring lots of CF cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Larter</title>
		<link>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18081</link>
		<author>Brian Larter</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18081</guid>
		<description>If you are considering landscape then you need wide. But your 18-55 sort of covers that but it's a very soft lens. I would suggest the 17-40mm. I own one and am currently using it for almost everything. Great studio lens for my small studio and perfect for landscapes. But if you want to go really wide take a look at the 10-22mm which I know leos rents as well. You have the 50mm for your wedding shots anyway, just not a lot of candids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are considering landscape then you need wide. But your 18-55 sort of covers that but it&#8217;s a very soft lens. I would suggest the 17-40mm. I own one and am currently using it for almost everything. Great studio lens for my small studio and perfect for landscapes. But if you want to go really wide take a look at the 10-22mm which I know leos rents as well. You have the 50mm for your wedding shots anyway, just not a lot of candids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18064</link>
		<author>andrea</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18064</guid>
		<description>Hey, my sister just told me this when she was driving to manitoba with my dad a few weeks ago, that might be a neat thing to see/take shots of. Apparently fields of canola can create fog around dusk, because of the way that the plants hold the heat from the sun differently than other crops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, my sister just told me this when she was driving to manitoba with my dad a few weeks ago, that might be a neat thing to see/take shots of. Apparently fields of canola can create fog around dusk, because of the way that the plants hold the heat from the sun differently than other crops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grums</title>
		<link>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18059</link>
		<author>Grums</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18059</guid>
		<description>You use the same equipment as me, but I have been thinking about buying a Sigma 10-20mm F/4-5.6 EX DC HSM for landscape photography. Read review here: http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Sigma-10-20mm-f4-56-EX-DC

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You use the same equipment as me, but I have been thinking about buying a Sigma 10-20mm F/4-5.6 EX DC HSM for landscape photography. Read review here: <a href="http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Sigma-10-20mm-f4-56-EX-DC" rel="nofollow">http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Sigma-10-20mm-f4-56-EX-DC</a></p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18056</link>
		<author>Erin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18056</guid>
		<description>Heya!  Long time no chat!  When's the wedding and how're you getting there?  If it's in late September you could prolly catch a ride with Jer :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heya!  Long time no chat!  When&#8217;s the wedding and how&#8217;re you getting there?  If it&#8217;s in late September you could prolly catch a ride with Jer :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Auer</title>
		<link>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18051</link>
		<author>Brian Auer</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.goldengod.net/2007/07/23/preparing-for-saskatchewan-my-first-attempt-at-landscape-photography/#comment-18051</guid>
		<description>I don't know about the reading part, I haven't really come across any dedicated landscape resources or books.  When it comes to lenses, though, you might look into something WIDE.  I have a blast with my 10-20 zoom, especially at the 10mm end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about the reading part, I haven&#8217;t really come across any dedicated landscape resources or books.  When it comes to lenses, though, you might look into something WIDE.  I have a blast with my 10-20 zoom, especially at the 10mm end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
